Friday, 18 March 2011

Mercurial Musings


For the first time since 1975, a manmade spacecraft is surveying the innermost planet of our Solar System.

MESSENGER, which stands for "MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging," left Earth's surface back in 2004 and took the long way round the inner Solar System before reaching its final destination on March 17th, 2011. And when I say "long," I mean 4.9 billion miles long. The full route consists of multiple flybys of Earth, Venus, and Mercury itself, as visualized in this animation. (For a more detailed discussion of gravitational assists, see my previous post on MESSENGER here.)


Now, almost eight years later, MESSENGER has settled into its new home and will begin taking data next week. The spacecraft's primary mission is to look for answers to such questions as: Why is Mercury so dense? What is the nature of Mercury's magnetic field? And what is the structure of Mercury's core?

Of the terrestrial planets in our Solar System, Mercury is by far the smallest and densest. Its surface is extremely old and undergoes daily temperature swings of over 1000 degrees. And its also the least explored. The better we can understand how Mercury formed and evolved, the better we can understand the conditions during the formation of our Solar System -- and our Earth.

Designing, building, and operating MESSENGER is no small feat. Neither is launching a sophisticated chunk of electronics into space and maneuvering it through the solar neighborhood. The scientists and engineers who got it there deserved to be celebrated. As does our desire to explore.

(Image credit: http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/messenger/main/index.html)

Thursday, 27 January 2011

Remembrance of Things Past


Today is the day NASA sets aside to remember those who gave their lives in pursuit of our dreams to explore above and beyond the surface of our planet.

January 27, 1967 - the Apollo 1 space capsule was engulfed in flames during a pre-launch test.

January 28, 1986 - the Space Shuttle Challenger exploded less than a minute and a half after launch.

February 1, 2003 - the Space Shuttle Columbia broke up upon re-entry.

While I wasn't alive during the Apollo program, I am old enough to remember exact where I was during both the Challenger and Columbia disasters. They both affected me deeply.

I have been in love with the Universe for as long as I can remember. I'm pretty sure it was a done deal when I first saw the Moon in the night sky. My mom can attest to that. Be it movie, book, or museum, I devoured all things space related. And while I've come out the other side of my astronaut phase (for various reasons), I would still gladly sit on top of a rocket, no matter what the risks, to have the chance to touch the stars. And I know each of the astronauts who lost their lives in these disasters felt the same.

So I'm glad NASA has established this day of remembrance to honor both the sacrifice that comes with exploration and the dreams that drives us to explore in the first place. Ad astra per aspera.

Monday, 3 January 2011

Happy New Anomalistic Year!

Time to pop the champagne again if you like to celebrate extremes. Today the Earth is at the point in its orbit closest to the Sun. Astronomers call it "perihelion," a description derived from the generic term for the point of greatest or least distance of a body from one of the foci in its elliptical orbit: apsis.

Johannes Kepler was the first to realize that the planets orbited the Sun in elliptical, rather than circular, orbits. This was radical at the time, because the heavens were considered divine and flawless; for the planets to orbit the Sun in non-circular orbits was tantamount to heresy. Yet, the detailed observations of Tycho Brahe that Kepler based his work on showed this to be the case.

Instead of a single center, like a circle, an ellipse has two centers, known as foci (plural for focus). When two celestial bodies are orbiting each other, they both move in elliptical orbits about a common center of mass where the gravitation force between them is balanced. This occurs at one of the foci. You can think of it like a seesaw where the center of mass is the fulcrum point where the seesaw balances. If two people of equal mass sat on a seesaw together, the balance point would be halfway between them. However, if one person greatly outweighed the other, the balance point would have to be moved much closer to the heavier individual. The center of mass between two celestial bodies is just the same. The mass of the Sun is about a million times more than the mass of the Earth, therefore the center of mass between the Sun and the Earth is greatly skewed towards the Sun.

Earth's elliptical orbit is characterized by an eccentricity of approximately 0.018. Eccentricity is defined as deviation from a perfect circle, where 0 is a perfectly circular orbit and 1 is a parabola, essentially a broken circle that is no longer a closed loop. Earth's orbital eccentricity actually varies from more circular (0.005) to somewhat elliptical (0.058) due to the gravitational interactions in the Solar System, but that's a post for another day.

(Figure so not drawn to scale)

With Earth's current eccentricity, it's orbit can be visualized as an ellipse with a major axis passing through both foci and connecting the two points of greatest and least distance from the Sun (the apses) This line is also formally called the "line of apsides" and the two apses as periapsis and apoapsis from the Greek "peri" meaning around and "apo" meaning from. To be specific to the Sun-Earth system, we can substitute "helios" for the more general apsis and therefore we get the slightly more familiar terms, at least to astronomers, of perihelion and aphelion which represent the two extremes of Earth's orbit. The distance between the Earth and Sun ranges from 98% to 102% of the average distance of approximately 93 million miles, at perihelion and aphelion, respectively - a difference of roughly 4 million miles. Not enough to make you take notice, unless you design spacecraft, study solar physics, and/or like to geek out on this stuff, like me.

Earlier today, at approximately 1900 GMT (~7pm in London), we swung through that point of closest approach, marking one anomalistic year since we last passed through perihelion at midnight on January 3, 2010. Daylight may be returning, but the Sun is now receding. So continue your new year(s) celebration and wave to the Sun as it sets today, as it will rise a little farther way tomorrow.

Friday, 31 December 2010

A Trip Around the Sun



(Updated because I am an idiot from time to time. It happens.)

Today is New Year's Eve, which means tomorrow is the start of a new year. But what is a year exactly? And would a year by any other name take as long?

While your life may not be ruled by Mercury in the 7th house, it is in fact defined by the stars. One year on the planet Earth is defined as the time it takes the Sun to complete its path through the zodiac along the ecliptic; in laymen's terms, one trip around the Sun. But in astronomical terms, a bit harder to define.

Let's start with the ecliptic. In the night sky, there are two important circles to keep track of. One is the celestial equator - take Earth's equator and project it out onto the night sky. That's it. It's essentially the equator of the stars. The other is the ecliptic - the plane of the Solar System in which all the planets (roughly) orbit the Sun. As the Earth is tilted on its axis 23 degrees, these two circles are also tilted with respect to each other, by the same amount. The zodiac is that familiar group of twelve constellations found along the ecliptic: Aries, Taurus, Gemini, Cancer, Leo, Virgo, Libra, Scorpio, Sagittarius, Capricorn, Aquarius, and Pisces. Just as Earth's equator has an analogy in the sky, the celestial sphere also contains lines of longitude and latitude. Each sign of the zodiac spans 30 degrees of longitude, or about two time zones on the sky. The Sun appears to follow a path through the zodiac as Earth's travels in its orbit. A year would then seem to be when the Sun passed through all twelve constellations.

Not so fast.

Turns out, nothing about Earth's orbit is stable, it's all precessing. Like a spinning top that wobbles slightly, each of Earth's orbital elements is in flux, oscillating with different frequencies. Earth's axis, tilted 23 degrees with respect to the plane of the Solar System, precessing most like the spinning top, making one complete wobble every 26,000 years. In addition, the wobble has a wobble - the actual tilt of Earth's axis actually varies between 22.1 and 24.5 degrees on a larger 41,000 year cycle. Finally, the eccentricity of Earth's elliptical orbit around the Sun alternates between close to circular and moderately elliptical every 100,000 years. On top of this, the Moon's orbit precesses. All of the planets in the Solar System gravitational interact with each other, every so slightly tweaking orbits here and there. And the stars themselves aren't even fixed in place.

The combination of all these variables makes it pretty hard to determine when Earth has returned to an exact point in time and space. Astronomers have come up with a myriad of definitions for each and every cyclical alignment they can identify. There's the sidereal year and the tropical year and the anomalistic year, the draconic, eclipse or ecliptic year, the lunar year, the heliacal year, the sothic year, the gaussian year, the besselian year, and my personal favorite: the vague year. Each is defined with respect to Earth and specific celestial bodies and years ranging from 346 to 383 days. That's roughly a month-long interval of new years to celebrate.

Of course, for historical, political, and economic reasons, the calendar year we abide by is an approximation of Earth's orbital period. And other than the lunar year, the differences between these other years are imperceptible to you and me. But I see no reason why we shouldn't celebrate each and every one of them. It's too easy to forget to look up once in a while and ponder the bigger picture.

So let's get started. Happy new years to you and your's in all sense of the word and I hope you enjoy this next trip around the Sun, through the zodiac, with respect to another star, perihelion, and/or node here and there.

(Image credit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ecliptic_path.jpg)

Thursday, 27 May 2010

One Down, Two to Go


Yesterday the Space Shuttle Atlantis landed at Kennedy Space Center (KSC), completing its final mission for NASA. I don't feel a special connections to Atlantis per se, but I have had mad love for a space vehicle before, so I can relate to those that have been with her, flown her, and worked on her since she was added to the orbiter fleet in 1985.

I was lucky enough to watch Atlantis lift off on her final flight in the shadow of the Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB), another inanimate structure that I feel strangely drawn towards. I participated in a NASA tweet-up for the launch at KSC and got to hear from several of the people integral to keeping Atlantis flying. I have been obsessed with all thing air and space since the year I saw both Top Gun and Space Camp in the theaters. I am still in awe of the machinery, both human and otherwise, that it takes to accomplish such things.

Everyone one I met at the tweet-up was passionate about space, exploration, education, and of course - rocket launches. I'll let my space-tweep Gene, who witnessed his very first shuttle launch, explain it to you:


Gene Gordon, Fairport, NY

A lot of us wear our heart on our sleeves when it comes to space, and another dedicated space-tweep at the launch took it one step further:


Norah Schneider, Wexford, PA

I'm still coming down from the high of this experience, so it was bittersweet to see Atlantis come back down to Earth yesterday, knowing that she'll be grounded from here on out.

No one likes to be grounded.

Sunday, 21 March 2010

5 Minute Science

My latest creative endeavour was brought about by the amazing Laura Conaway. Laura and I first worked together when I blogged for the now sadly gone Bryant Park Project. She landed on her feet at the Rachel Maddow Show and reached out to me in the new year. The result is a growing series of short videos of what I like to call whiteboard science. Each week, Laura and I settle on a scientific topic and break it down into a clear explanation and simple diagrams that can fit on a whiteboard. So far I think we've been successful, but you can be the judge.

Video #1: Kepler Space Mission

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy


Video #2: Happy Birthday, Pluto

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy


Video #3: Type-1A Supernova

A New Kind of Supernova -- Not Champagne, Either from The Rachel Maddow Show on Vimeo.


Video #4: Parallax

Parallax: Beyond Wayne's World from The Rachel Maddow Show on Vimeo.


Video #5: Vernal Equinox

Quick Study: The Vernal Equinox from The Rachel Maddow Show on Vimeo.

Sunday, 8 November 2009

What Color is the Sky in Your World?

That used to be my favorite expression to tell someone I thought they were full of it. Turns out it's a scientifically valid question after all. Only instead of the sky, astronomers are interested in determining the color of the entire Universe. This may seem like asking what does the Moon taste like, but I can assure you that the collective astronomy community has not spontaneously developed a case of synesthesia.

The medium astronomers work with most is light. In fact, it's pretty much the only medium we have to work with. Everything in the Universe emits some form of electromagnetic radiation and some of that radiation makes it way to Earth and is detected by our telescopes. In addition to the stars in the night sky, there are an unfathomable number of other astronomical objects out there that we have detected and observed in some detail - most notably hundreds of thousands of galaxies, made up themselves of billions of stars and numerous conglomerations of gas and dust known as nebulae.

On a bit of a lark, astronomers decided to take a representative sample of 200,000 galaxies to determine the dominant wavelength of their composite light. The phenomenon we call light comes in a wide range of frequencies known as the electromagnetic spectrum. It runs the gauntlet from low energy, long wavelength radio waves through the canonical rainbow to gamma rays, the highest form of energy currently detectable. However, color is a property unique to optical wavelengths.

So to determine the color of the Universe, astronomers looked at this sample of galaxies through just the narrow window of the visible spectrum and obtained an aggregate signal that can be represented by either a plot of the spectral energy distribution, or by the crowd favorite: a rainbow.



Astronomers prefer the former, but we definitely appreciate the appeal and the accessibility of the latter.

However, rainbows can be misleading. If your eyes were to take in all the light from these 200,000 galaxies at once, you would not see a rainbow, but rather the sum of its constituent wavelengths. It's like how we view sunlight; it appears essentially white as it pours in through a window, but place a prism in just the right spot on the window sill and you can extract its signature rainbow.

Now, imagine a room where the light of the Universe shines through the window. Your eyes would most likely interpret the color of the Universe as white as well, but us astronomers prefer to be more specific. Calculating the exact location of the color in a CIE chromaticity diagram, an international standard for primary colors, prescribes the color of the Universe to be...

...........drumroll please...........

BEIGE! Beige? Yes, beige.


I admit I was hoping for a color with a bit more pizzazz. But then again, the pizzazz is that I no longer ask the question in jest. The sky in my world is beige, thank you very much.

(Image credits:http://www.pha.jhu.edu/~kgb/cosspec/)